ApolloLife sciences

Two specialists that help research teams stay on course.

Built for a life-sciences research consultancy, Apollo brings two AI agents into the team’s own workspace. One supports project management. The other, an epidemiologist, supports study methods. Both prepare work for the scientists who make the decisions.

Project manager

Keeps plans, timelines and decisions organised and visible.

One shared workspace: projects, files and a team wiki

Epidemiologist

Drafts study methods and reviews them for sources of bias.

Project management

Engagements kept organised, from kick-off to delivery

Apollo’s project manager sets up each project in the firm’s own way of working, watches for anything falling behind, and brings it to the right person’s attention.

Set-up

Kick-off outlineDrafted by Apollo

Design

Study protocolWith the epidemiologist
Analysis planAwaiting a decision

Execution

Cohort definitionIn progress

Delivery

Final reportScheduled
A note from the project manager
What has happened
The analysis plan is a week behind the agreed timeline.
Why it matters
Two later tasks depend on it.
What I have done
Updated the timeline and noted the dependency.
What I need
A decision on whether to move the delivery date.

Study methods

Study methods, drafted and then reviewed

Apollo’s epidemiologist prepares methods work on the firm’s templates. A separate review step then examines the draft before a senior scientist takes it forward.

Study specification
  • Eligibility criteriaDrafted
  • Treatment strategiesDrafted
  • Assignment procedureDrafted
  • Start of follow-upOpen: more detail needed
  • OutcomesDrafted
  • Causal contrastDrafted
  • Analysis planOpen: more detail needed
Independent review
  • Timing of follow-up Clear
  • Selection of participants Clear
  • Loss to follow-up Flag
  • Outcome measurement Clear
  • Reporting checklist Clear
ResultPass, with one flag for the scientist

Where a brief does not give enough to go on, Apollo says so and leaves the item open. An honest gap is more useful to a scientist than a confident guess.

A visible process

A way of working your team can see and shape

Each agent follows a process the team can open, read and edit. When the firm refines how it works, the agents follow, and every change is kept in a version history.

Understandthe requestDrafton the templateReviewagainst the checklistHand overto a personDashed line: back for another pass,when the review asks for it.

Working together

The agents prepare. The scientists decide.

Apollo takes care of

  • Project boards, timelines and meeting notes
  • Checks against the firm’s own standards
  • Study specifications and protocol drafts
  • A structured review, with a written result

The team looks after

  • Every word that goes to a client
  • Scientific interpretation and sign-off
  • Decisions the agents bring forward
  • Teaching the agents how the firm works

Designed with care

Assistants to the experts

People speak to clients

The agents draft, check and flag. Anything that leaves the firm is reviewed and sent by a person.

Read-only where it should be

The agents can read the firm’s boards and channels to stay informed, and cannot change them.

Careful with data

Methods work uses aggregated, de-identified or synthetic data only.

A reviewer for every draft

The step that writes a draft is never the step that approves it.

Built within your systems

Apollo is deployed in your organisation’s own cloud and follows your own standards, templates and project boards.

Curious whether Apollo would suit your team?

We are happy to walk you through it in more detail, and to hear how the work is done in your organisation today.